The Greatest Showman

Remember in one second [End of the God Station] Mobile phone user input address: m.xinwanben.com

As one of the most famous and authoritative film critics in North America, Roger-Ebert underwent surgery for thyroid cancer in 2oo8, and since then, the number of film reviews he has written has increased significantly. The three major film festivals in Europe have no way to travel because of the long-distance flight. More often, they wait for the film to be released in North America before writing film reviews. .

However, Toronto is located in the nearest neighbor of North America, and now it ranks among the fourth largest international film festivals - the influence has faintly passed Venice, so Roger still arrived in Toronto on time and joined the film festival as soon as possible. in the celebration.

It's natural to see Roger's comments in the official journal, but Roger's comments actually appeared in the two works "The Thief in the City" and "Buried Alive" at the same time, which surprised countless people— —

As we all know, yesterday's screening of "The Thief in the City" attracted countless firepower, and almost all the big-name film critics who arrived in Toronto attended the red carpet, but the screening of "Buried Alive" was very shabby, and there was no comparison at all, but from now on Judging from the situation, Roger made a special trip to watch "Buried Alive" at night after watching "The Thief in the City", and it was still under the premise of physical discomfort.

What does this mean? Perhaps some reasons can be seen from Roger's film review.

"A near-impossible challenge, a near-perfect answer." That's the title of Roger's film review, expressing his point clearly.

"The secret room movie has always been short of excellent works. How to complete the scheduling of shots and perspectives in a limited space is the first problem; and how to complete the character shaping and theme elaboration in a limited performance space, this is the first problem. Two puzzles.

In 'Buried Alive', this conundrum is taken to the extreme, the whole story is born in a coffin, and only one actor appears on the scene, taking the genre movie to the extreme.

Under such an extreme framework, Cortez's control of the audience's emotions is undoubtedly successful. He not only showed his excellent rhythm control ability, but the ups and downs of the plot firmly caught the audience's attention; The atmosphere creation has shown a very good talent, recalling the amazing performance of m-nght-shyama1an in 'The Sixth Sense', which is tightly packed in horror and suspense Grasp the rope of hope firmly and keep the suspense until the very last moment. In particular, the director adopted a '2:35' lens ratio, which maximized the realistic effect of room phobia.

I definitely don't like being buried alive.

With such limited resources, acting is undoubtedly a daunting challenge, but Hall is an extremely good actor. He is not only competent but also completes the task, showing his talent and skills to the fullest. In many shots, there are thousands of words in his eyes, all the jumbled and turbulent emotions bring the most profound experience in the most minimal way; watching Hall's performance, it is a pleasure, in his Under the interpretation of the film, the film is not only persuasive, but also not only arouses the emotions of the audience, but more importantly, sublimates the theme——

Vulnerability and sadness as an independent individual in front of the state apparatus and large corporations. A 'sorry', but it can't support the weight of life!

Purely from the perspective of the script, this is not a successful work. The lack of details and the limitations of the pattern restrict the in-depth excavation; but it is a work with a successful performance. The amplification and excavation of emotions allows the audience to experience the real experience. The ups and downs of a roller coaster, the fear and happiness after watching the movie, are the signs of the success of the movie.

A wooden box, an actor, and a suffocating masterpiece was a near-impossible challenge, but Cortez delivered a near-perfect answer. More importantly, it gave the audience their first glimpse of Renly Hall. "

Roger is currently the most influential film critic in North America. He is not only the first film critic to receive the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism, but also has his own TV shows and film festivals he set up. It can be said that his film critics It has become a literary form and has been universally recognized.

In Roger's system of comments, everything is "relative, not absolute". He thinks that when someone asks if Hellboy is good, they're not asking if it's good compared to Mystic River, they're asking if it's good compared to Punisher, so Roger gives His judgment is that "people" is four points, "Hellboy" is three points, and "punisher" is two points.

Therefore, Roger usually gives two ratings when relying on movies, one is the rating of the movie itself, and the other is the recommendation rating. Simply put, some works are excellent in their own right, but perhaps too heavy, too obscure, or too popcorn to recommend to viewers. He insisted, "The film is excellent if it achieves the purpose of shooting, but admitting it does not mean that the film itself is worthy of recommendation."

Therefore, when evaluating "Buried Alive", Roger also said that this is a movie that tests the audience's nerves and is not recommended to watch. In the case of a four-star perfect score, he gave a two-star recommendation, and said, "Danny Ball's '127 Hours' will be released tomorrow, and it also tells the story of a loner surviving in a desperate situation. At that time, the two films may be discussed together."

Compared with "The Thief in the City", Roger showed greater interest in the work "Buried Alive", and especially his respect for Renly attracted countless attention.

Unlike "War in the Pacific" and the Emmy Awards, this is the Toronto Film Festival, where the world's top filmmakers gather

Together, even a little-known independent film like "Buried Alive" can win the attention of everyone as long as it is brilliant enough. Obviously, "Buried Alive" ushered in such a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. Following "Variety" and "Chicago Sun" written by Roger, the other seven film critics have also attracted more attention.

"New York Times" film critic Elizabeth - Weitzman (e1zabeth-etzman) is also an authoritative representative of North America, can serve in the first newspaper in the United States, her views are undoubtedly worth learning from. This time, she also joined the ranks of her colleagues and sent praise to the film, saying in the comments:

"Rough yet delicate, simple yet profound, the movie shows the big world under a small pattern, and it truly and credibly presents the beginnings and turns of all emotions, pushing the self-help in confined spaces to the limit, but it truly reflects What comes out is the complexity and fragility of human nature. When the cast list appeared, every audience was immersed in darkness and could not extricate themselves. This is the success of the director, and more importantly, the success of the actors. Undoubtedly, this is Toronto this year. One of the best films since its opening."

Vanity Fair's reviews were written by 1ade-pg, a freelance film critic who, like Roger, runs his own review site, and his reviews can appear in any magazine or newspaper. However, since he signed with "Vanity Fair" last year, his film review has found a fixed platform.

Being favored by "Vanity Fair" itself shows Claudy's excellence, and more importantly, Claudy is highly sought after among young people with the influence of online platforms. This is also his greatest strength.

"Ho

Support (end this site) and share this site with those who need it! Can't find the book, please leave a message!