Dark Civilization

reply to book review

Since entering Chapter 15 of the prehistoric disaster, everyone has been asking about the size and food intake of ants. Indeed, with such a large size, ten earths will be eaten up by ants, and they will completely become an ant empire. If they keep multiplying, the planet will not be able to bear it sooner or later. live.

First of all, thank you for your book reviews. I have always been open to opinions, and I will ask someone to help answer most of the questions. However, the ant monster is too involved in the later setting of the book, and I can’t explain it all at once, otherwise I will expose the old story. Well, let’s take a look at what I’m going to say next, and maybe you won’t question it anymore.

Let me talk about the novel first, which is the theme of the end of the world.

When humans can evolve and hunt zombies to increase their strength, they are still destroyed by monsters. Many prehistoric civilizations, such as Atlantis and ancient Babylon, are very powerful, and finally disappeared in the long river of history. In the design of my outline It is decided that there are inside stories.

In doomsday novels, the greatest enemy of human beings and the cause of the destruction of the world are nothing more than monsters. In this case, giant ants are also monsters, and they brought destruction to human beings and even the earth. It's as if ordinary people are facing endless zombies, while new humans are facing endless ant behemoths. Only the power ratio of the two sides has increased, but human beings are still at a disadvantage.

What the protagonist has to do is to change this trend in the future development and remove the destructive growth bomb of ants. This is the first way to save the end times. The earth has contributed.

In the setting of the book. Ants have the excellent genetic lineage of prehistoric giant beasts, so their strength is 400 times their weight, so they can easily defeat creatures of the same weight and size, except for special types.

under the virus.

All kinds of monster genes have recovered from prehistoric times, reached the advanced level, and may evolve again to become stronger. The harsh environment is the best place to promote the evolution of life.

The question now is, how do the protagonist get rid of so many ants on the earth? Can the protagonist complete this seemingly impossible task?

Recently, because of everyone’s questions, the book often gives answers, which reduces the sense of rhythm. Most of the words are about explaining book reviews, which reduces the pleasure of reading. I am a little depressed and have to open a single chapter to explain.

For example, the strength of ants with 30 people in the first month has increased by tens of thousands of times, while the strength of tigers has only increased by 50 times. This is a foreshadowing. Some people may say that this is another loophole. Later on, people won't feel that way anymore.

In fact, in the first 100,000 words, a lot of foreshadowing was quietly buried.

I may not have as many foreshadowings as Chen Dongda's. His is magnificent and conspicuous, and it is immediately known to people that this is a foreshadowing, which is equivalent to a tyrant. My foreshadowing is just buried quietly without explanation. killer.

And as a semi-new and not old writer...

Without the reputation of a great god, without a solid click-through rate, everyone will feel that this is a newcomer, and a newcomer's book will have some loopholes, so...

We have a cup.

Of course, there are still some problems in the book so far. After all, it is all about the evolution of viruses, the development of various life, etc., which has a lot of scientific content. Friends, you can see it at once and point it out.

I can only say that some are foreshadowing, maybe you think this is a loophole, but I saw it when you posted the post, and I will probably reply if I have time. If it is a real loophole, I will admit it frankly. I have written a book with millions of words, but I still feel that I am still a newcomer and I still have a lot to learn.

When a newcomer writes a book, there are some loopholes.

But I hope that you guys will be magnanimous, and forgive me for some not-so-big mistakes, such as giant ants. This is a serious problem, so everyone keeps posting and replying.

Just wish I saw.

Then revise and make the writing better, I feel this kind of heart, thank you very much for your support.

Facing flawed problems like this in the book, they will give explanations in replies. If they are foreshadowing, some of them may not be too explicit in the explanation. Otherwise, I will dig out the foreshadowing in the future when everyone talks about it, which is a bit dumbfounding. up.

I remember that in the chapters I wrote before, there were typos and some small oversights. I replied to admit them and correct them immediately. .

After all, the road is still long...

If there is a mistake, it must be corrected.

Only in this way can there be progress.

I recently saw a post saying that monster evolution is only about strength and size?

In fact, it is not. From the chapter of Butterfly Superman, it is written that the butterfly originally only sprayed odor to drive away the enemy, but the evolved butterfly can spray poisonous gas. This is a change.

It's only been two months now. If the monsters in the early stage have various innate skills and unique attributes, it will be illogical. After all, the history of evolution is a long process. Although the speed has soared countless times under the virus, but It still doesn't take a month to evolve a shape, that's too outrageous.

The protagonist's Ant Superman is taking the main attack route, increasing his strength in an all-round way. It is also said in the book that the giant ant is a prehistoric super peak bloodline, a super dominant monster on land.

As the protagonist, it is naturally impossible to remain so ordinary in the future.

There are still a lot of things to say, I don’t know where to start, it’s also my mistake that everyone will raise such doubts, if I write less foreshadowing and more explanations, maybe everyone will not raise such doubts.

It's my point of view on writing a book.

Foreshadowing, if people see it as a foreshadowing, what else is it called a foreshadowing.

In the future, I will try to make the foreshadowing as conspicuous as possible, or in other words, I will leave some reminders to let some careful people know that this is a foreshadowing.

In this way, doubts will be reduced, and everyone will feel comfortable watching it. Thank you for teaching us a lesson, and we will continue to work hard in the future.

At last……

I also hope that everyone will support and vote more in the future. If you have any comments, please say. Most of them will reply to the post or reply in the book. At least I am still free and have this time to reply. And in the future, the more solid the book will be, the less doubts you will have, and the more happiness you will have. This is what I am looking forward to.

);.

Tap the screen to use advanced tools Tip: You can use left and right keyboard keys to browse between chapters.

You'll Also Like